in reply to Re^2: bug in the debugger? breakpoints in subroutines ignored if attributes present (work-around)
in thread bug in the debugger? breakpoints in subroutines ignored if attributes present

I don't see how what you describe makes what I suggested any less useful. Instead of putting a breakpoint on a method, list the start of the method and put a breakpoint on the first line inside of the method. I certainly didn't step "though lots of intervening code" so I'm not sure why you think you would need to.

- tye        

  • Comment on Re^3: bug in the debugger? breakpoints in subroutines ignored if attributes present (work-around)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: bug in the debugger? breakpoints in subroutines ignored if attributes present (work-around)
by wu-lee (Beadle) on Apr 23, 2007 at 17:02 UTC
    Ah yes, apologies. I misunderstood what you were suggesting and thought the solution would only work in the example. I didn't realise that the l command could take a subroutine as an argument and subsequently let you breakpoint the result. This'll do nicely.