in reply to Re: Curiosity on some new usernames
in thread Curiosity on some new usernames

And, last I heard, they didn't even bother to register the names in a way that they'll ever be able to use them. Just because you haven't figured out whether it will work doesn't mean you should wait before kicking off a big batch of spamming, I guess.

- tye        

  • Comment on Re^2: Curiosity on some new usernames (id012t)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Curiosity on some new usernames (id012t)
by f00li5h (Chaplain) on Apr 26, 2007 at 01:20 UTC

    Anyone with a "contact us" form on their website knows what's going on with these.

    They stuff fields that look like a "contact us" or a "post an anonymous message" and fill them with assorted different markups (including html tags and bbcode) in the hope that their spam message will appear on your forums for a couple of hours until an admin deltes it.

    i'm not sure why they don't see the anonymonk post form, but I would have expected to see them posting a lot more replies as anonymonk offering \|iaqra, molex watches and Soft tabs tha make you f33l like a m4n

    *twitch* not that I'm bitter about that

    @_=qw; ask f00li5h to appear and remain for a moment of pretend better than a lifetime;;s;;@_[map hex,split'',B204316D8C2A4516DE];;y/05/os/&print;
Re^3: Curiosity on some new usernames (id012t)
by MidLifeXis (Monsignor) on Apr 25, 2007 at 19:33 UTC

    Goes right along with spam I occasionally get that looks as if the sc^Hpammer forgot to run something and sends out their template.

    --MidLifeXis