in reply to Re^7: What's wrong with Perl 6?
in thread What's wrong with Perl 6?

Because somehow Parrot (written mostly in C) doesn't count for Perl 6, as far as I understood the post to which I replied.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: What's wrong with Perl 6?
by demerphq (Chancellor) on May 14, 2007 at 19:17 UTC

    I consider a implementation running on parrot to be pretty much an implementation in C. If your original comment meant to imply that since the implementation would be via parrot that it didnt count as an implementation in C then I apologise for the misunderstanding.

    ---
    $world=~s/war/peace/g

[reply]

      Ah, okay. Yes, I think Parrot's the best long-term strategy for a viable Perl 6 at this point. (Working on it doesn't endear me to C though.)

[reply]

In Section Meditations