Re: Seeking explanation on assigning a hash to a scalar

The poor English isn't what's annoying. What's really annoying is the constantly posting trivial questions to which you either should know the answers (even with the marginal Perl abilities that you've displayed here previously) or to which the answer should be readily apparent after no more than 5 or 10 minutes of careful reading of the obviously appropriate documentation (or from using an obvious search term here or on google).

Comment on Re: Seeking explanation on assigning a hash to a scalar

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Seeking explanation on assigning a hash to a scalar by liverpole (Monsignor) on May 15, 2007 at 13:09 UTC
++Fletch. I'm in total agreement. Now I'll be willing to admit that maybe I was wrong, jesuashok, if you actually respond to Fletch's claim, and explain *why* you keep constantly posting trivial questions. But my money's on your ignoring his question, as usual, and moving on to yet another question which the documents are happy to provide an immediate answer for. (Update: Looks like I was correct). By the way, a number of times in the past you've made it clear that you're not too happy with getting tons of -- votes. I submit to you that your wasting time and space here is the main factor. As a result, unless you have some fabulous reason for continuing these charades, I'll continue to vote you down every time you ask these silly questions. s''(q.S:$/9=(T1';s;(..)(..);$..=substr+crypt($1,$2),2,3;eg;print$..$/	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Seeking explanation on assigning a hash to a scalar
by liverpole (Monsignor) on May 15, 2007 at 13:09 UTC

Fletch

Now I'll be willing to admit that maybe I was wrong, jesuashok, if you actually respond to Fletch's claim, and explain why you keep constantly posting trivial questions.

But my money's on your ignoring his question, as usual, and moving on to yet another question which the documents are happy to provide an immediate answer for. (Update: Looks like I was correct).

By the way, a number of times in the past you've made it clear that you're not too happy with getting tons of -- votes. I submit to you that your wasting time and space here is the main factor. As a result, unless you have some fabulous reason for continuing these charades, I'll continue to vote you down every time you ask these silly questions.

s''(q.S:$/9=(T1';s;(..)(..);$..=substr+crypt($1,$2),2,3;eg;print$..$/

[reply]