in reply to Re: On TMTOWTDIness
in thread On TMTOWTDIness
I don't think there's any language except perhaps C which is as flexibleYou name it. Since you have assembler roots, you will surely have heard of FORTH, a language that seems forgotten but is still very alive and kicking :-)
...
I think there's a lot to be said for looking at other code, and the Monastery provides an entertaining gateway into the insights of others that no other community website brings forth.
It allows mixing of interpretation and compilation state, it is interactive as well as compiled, implemented both in software and in hardware - it is arguably more flexible than C.
--shmem
_($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo. G°\ /
/\_¯/(q /
---------------------------- \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."·
");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: On TMTOWTDIness
by samizdat (Vicar) on May 16, 2007 at 15:47 UTC | |
by shmem (Chancellor) on May 16, 2007 at 16:14 UTC | |
by blazar (Canon) on May 16, 2007 at 18:44 UTC | |
by shmem (Chancellor) on May 16, 2007 at 20:32 UTC |