Re^4: Super Search discouraged?

Unfortunately, we have just the one box doing both search & goto functionality. Separating these two would be good.

Actually I find that useful: in fact I use the simple search almost exclusively to go straight to some node of which I know the title in advance, e.g. a home node. OTOH it's funny that I stumbled upon this thread clicking on Super Search the other day, since the link is implemented by name, not by id.

Comment on Re^4: Super Search discouraged?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Super Search discouraged? by naikonta (Curate) on May 20, 2007 at 11:35 UTC
since the link is implemented by name, not by id I think you meant that the link you clicked the other day is presented with name as I'm definitely sure you know that every node is implemented by id and name as well. Open source softwares? Share and enjoy. Make profit from them if you can. Yet, share and enjoy!	[reply]
Re^6: Super Search discouraged? by blazar (Canon) on May 20, 2007 at 11:50 UTC
since the link is implemented by name, not by id I think you meant that the link you clicked the other day is presented with name as I'm definitely sure you know that every node is implemented by id and name as well. I think that it's the same thing, in fact I didn't write that the node is "implemented by name" (which is also sloppy as an expression, but hopefully quite understandable after all). I wrote that the link is: you even quoted that! See the additionally emphasized terms above.	[reply]