in reply to Server getting and utilizing cookie
Sadly, I can't republish the column until it has appeared in print, so wait a month or two and you'll see the whole thing.
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: Server getting and utilizing cookie
by boo_radley (Parson) on Mar 02, 2001 at 01:43 UTC | |
update I'm 100 posts old! I'd like to thank God, and the Academy, and Vroom, but not necessarily in that order. please enjoy my new home node image in celebration of this event. | [reply] |
by boo_radley (Parson) on Mar 03, 2001 at 03:24 UTC | |
Update I guess I could've expected the reply I got... *sigh* I wanted to search only the code listings to maximize the possibility of really getting a relevant article. If I searched through the entire site, or through the articles, I got results that make even less sense then they do now. (see this for example) :) So, while I do plead ignorance to the column listed, I think my solution is better tailored for the situation. Here's some sample output : See my WT column on 'file' ideas. This smacks of cargo cult code. If I tried to run this past a customer, he'd shoot me. Are you sure you understand the problem? For a more full featured exploration of files concepts, see my WT Column. See my WT column on 'error' ideas. I've already covered this topic. Check out my Web Techniques column on the subject. I've already covered this topic. Check out my Web Techniques column on the subject. I don't see why people insist on trying to write partially implemented solutions for this type of thing, especially when they can reference this'mail' WT column. Why reinvent the wheel? Check mirod before you put serious time into this. I've already covered this topic. Check out my Web Techniques column on the subject. Oddly enough, this is precisely demonstrated in an upcoming WT column. Sadly, I can't republish the column until it has appeared in print, so wait a month or two and you'll see the whole thing. Oddly enough, this is precisely demonstrated in an upcoming WT column. Sadly, I can't republish the column until it has appeared in print, so wait a month or two and you'll see the whole thing. See my WT column on 'print' ideas. I don't see why people insist on trying to write partially implemented solutions for this type of thing, especially when they can reference this'x' WT column. I've written a lot of things here on the topic of printf. Try searching for them before asking questions like this. This smacks of cargo cult code. If I tried to run this past a customer, he'd shoot me. Are you sure you understand the problem? Oddly enough, this is precisely demonstrated in an upcoming WT column. Sadly, I can't republish the column until it has appeared in print, so wait a month or two and you'll see the whole thing. Why reinvent the wheel? Check chmodded before you put serious time into this. This smacks of cargo cult code. If I tried to run this past a customer, he'd shoot me. Are you sure you understand the problem?
| [reply] [d/l] |
by merlyn (Sage) on Mar 03, 2001 at 03:39 UTC | |
By the way, searching my site is easy, when you use my column on searching my site... in fact the code can be nearly directly lifted into yours. Don't reinvent the wheel! | [reply] |
by merlyn (Sage) on Mar 03, 2001 at 04:00 UTC | |
I wanted to search only the code listings to maximize the possibility of really getting a relevant article. If I searched through the entire site, or through the articles, I got results that make even less sense then they do now. (see this for example) :) So, while I do plead ignorance to the column listed, I think my solution is better tailored for the situation.you can just have WWW::Search::Google look for: and you'll get just the columns. I just tried it, works fine. -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker update: Thanks for that idea... I've implemented the column-only search on my site now! | [reply] [d/l] |