in reply to Re^3: Writing Interpreters, Compilers and Translators in Perl
in thread Writing Interpreters, Compilers and Translators in Perl

I mean for Perl 6 - but thanks for the link anyway.
__________________________________________________________________________________

^M Free your mind!

  • Comment on Re^4: Writing Interpreters, Compilers and Translators in Perl

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Writing Interpreters, Compilers and Translators in Perl
by blazar (Canon) on May 24, 2007 at 15:58 UTC
    I mean for Perl 6 - but thanks for the link anyway.

    All the links, but TimToady's home node have to do with Perl 6.

[reply]
      oic, yes ur right. Meanwhile I also came across Damian's Perl6::Rules, version dated April 12th 2007, don't know if there was one before that on CPAN, which provides a limited subset for use under Perl5 already - it has an example of using it to define a language grammar for HTML prior to parsing. And I was already considering a "special-needs" XML parser as an example to demonstrate when you can and can't use Parse::RecDescent - hmmm the plot thickens!
      __________________________________________________________________________________

      ^M Free your mind!

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom