I meant my post(reply) being a flame. Whenever I've pointed out a perl 6 issue, it's usually met with "Troll" instead of addressing the actual content of my words, so it was about my post, in response to yours. I was talking about perl 6, yes. As far as language agnosticism goes, maybe it's more polytheist? It borrows arrow syntax, dot syntax, weird syntax from Mars, syntax from Python specifically, whitespace matters (sometimes), on and on... not aligning itself to any bias completely and that was my reasoning for my reply. I've been meaning to make a meditation on it and describe this point fully, but nothing directed at the quality of your response, only adding to the perl 6 part.