Re^2: subroutine prototypes still bad?

It's gotten slightly better due to dave_m's work but what you wrote is usually a memory-leak magnet. Error.pm is a horrible module just because of the closure related leaks.

⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

Comment on Re^2: subroutine prototypes still bad?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: subroutine prototypes still bad? by dmitri (Priest) on Jun 13, 2007 at 11:57 UTC
Are you referring to the `try` inside a `try`? That inside "try" is meant to be some other function call. :) I have used Error.pm in long-running network daemons without many problems. I am aware that closures may cause memory leaks, but haven't run into one related to Error.pm	[reply]