With a big thanks to Jenda for noticing this perl syntax,

($_=Just,$\="l hacker")=~(S_&&y,Jk csluath, hate Porn,),print, ($_=Just,$\="l hacker")=~($_&&y,Jk csluath, hate Porn,),print,

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Twin-lines japh
by blazar (Canon) on Jun 19, 2007 at 08:05 UTC
    ($_=Just,$\="l hacker")=~(S_&&y,Jk csluath, hate Porn,),print, ($_=Just,$\="l hacker")=~($_&&y,Jk csluath, hate Porn,),print,

    ++, very Abigail-ish IMHO: it neither really features data nor logic obfu, in the sense that it's easy to see where the data is and have at least a naive understanding of what the logic does, but it's surprising that is works at all that!

Re: Twin-lines japh
by ambrus (Abbot) on Jun 28, 2008 at 09:18 UTC

    There's a current discussion on perl5porters about how /$x/ behaves specially when $x is empty (and this is true to /\Q$x/ as well). That magic is totally way crazyer than the one I'm using in this obfu (or the similar one in Re^3: A cleaner way of scoping variables; or the one you get if you combine either of these with inlined constant subroutines). My obfu is topped.

Re: Twin-lines japh
by ambrus (Abbot) on Oct 21, 2010 at 14:38 UTC

    P5p have decided that the feature I'm using here is a bug, and so perl 5.13.6 breaks this obfu. Try this quickily while it still works.