in reply to Re: To thank or not to thank?
in thread To thank or not to thank?
If it is just to say "Thank you", you add nothing of content to the thread and is indeed perhaps better done in a /msg. It is more personal and nicer.
Thank you for your contribution! (This is actually a meta-thanks!) In fact that's what I wrote in the root node too, and what I currently do. Yet, as I also underlined there, it may leave the respondent with Warnock... yes, I also wrote that it would leave people reading the thread with him as well - of course an update cures that. And of course each solution has its own advantages and its best area of application, as you clearly point out. Though there are overlappings. Thus I started this thread to see whether there was some sort of consensus both wrt the current status and if any good idea/brainstorming could get out for an additional "official" solution. Personally I think that simpler nodes with no vote button and limited text content, to be rendered as a footnote to some other node would be very nice to have. But that's just me, and a whole implementation away, of course!
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: To thank or not to thank?
by CountZero (Bishop) on Jun 26, 2007 at 08:01 UTC |