Re^2: fetching array of array, using a loop

Dear shmem,

First of all, thank you for your time. Yes, you are right.

or do you want the elements at index 7 in each array ref on one line?

I want @temparray to be stored at 7th index.

Now after putting my @tmp in brackets; and using your lines of code I am getting this error. Can't use string ("G6081") as an ARRAY ref while "strict refs" in use at perly.pl line 24.

Further, Is there anyway to know how @finalarr (line 89) is arranging its all elements down to bottom?? Pl help

Comment on Re^2: fetching array of array, using a loop

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: fetching array of array, using a loop by shmem (Chancellor) on Jun 27, 2007 at 10:02 UTC
I suggst you get and install Data::Dump::Streamer or Data::Dumper. With either of those you can dump your data structure and examine it, e.g. `use Data::Dump::Streamer; ... my $cordinate_r = genedraw ($mid_r,$base_length,$margin); Dump ($cordinate_r);` [download] The question about the array at the 7^th index was about wether it is required to have its elements in packs of four on different lines, or can those just be lumped together on one line? Can't use string ("G6081") as an ARRAY ref while "strict refs" in use at perly.pl line 24. Is that the line after the `foreach` loop control statement, dereferencing `$ref`? Seems like you are not constructing the references properly, since the incriminated token is what should be `$ref->[0]` inside the foreach loop, not `$cordinate_r->[0]`. Anyways, here is your running script, slightly reformatted to make it readable. Read more... (5 kB) --shmem _($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo. G°\ / /\_¯/(q / ---------------------------- \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."· ");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: fetching array of array, using a loop by cool (Scribe) on Jun 27, 2007 at 11:41 UTC
Thank you very much shmem, Things seem working now because of your inputs. Though I have not started using Data::dumper still but will do so today and get back to you. Many thanks.. and ++ :)	[reply]