Re^2: Nested evals - are they evil? (sample benchmarks)

I would expect eval to be a little slower, but not that much. Maybe this is because of the extra scope you're adding here. Try changing the no_eval_code to this, to see if the extra scoping is free or not:

sub no_eval_code {
    for (reverse 0..9) {
        if ($_==0) {
            error_sub();
        }
        else {
            {
                my $x = 100/$_;
            }
        }
    }
}
[download]

Comment on Re^2: Nested evals - are they evil? (sample benchmarks) Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Nested evals - are they evil? (sample benchmarks) by cLive ;-) (Prior) on Jul 31, 2007 at 17:57 UTC
heh `Rate eval noeval eval 88768/s -- -39% noeval 146161/s 65% --` [download]	[reply] [d/l]