(OT) Re^4: Snarky comments on the ddj perl quiz

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Snarky comments on the ddj perl quiz by Anonymous Monk on Aug 29, 2007 at 23:43 UTC
But both were 5 days before your comment: Aug 27, 2007 at 23:14 UTC I would guess that the Snark thread was a response to the other discussion, deliberately seperating the snark from the serious discussion, but I did not start this thread, so I can't say for sure.	[reply]
Re^6: Snarky comments on the ddj perl quiz by ysth (Canon) on Aug 30, 2007 at 00:48 UTC
I did not know of the other thread when I started this one. However, I became aware of the quiz as a result of a chatterbox comment that may have resulted from the other thread. Just in case anybody cares. I admit to being a little puzzled by the "already" so long after the fact, but thought the link to the other thread was a good thing.	[reply]
(OT) Re^7: Snarky comments on the ddj perl quiz by Argel (Prior) on Aug 30, 2007 at 19:34 UTC
I admit to being a little puzzled by the "already" so long after the fact, but thought the link to the other thread was a good thing. I could swear that I saw the other thread on Monday and later in the day this one appeared. Other than Seekers of Perl Wisdom I usually rely on just The Monastery Gates so a thread may be a few days old but will appear to be "new" to me if it was recently frontpaged. So it's either a question of when they were frontpaged or if I saw the other one while somehow missing this one. Sorry for any confusion! Update: And sorry about sort of hijacking your thread.	[reply]
Re^8: Snarky comments on the ddj perl quiz (hijack, pvnv memory) by ysth (Canon) on Aug 30, 2007 at 22:27 UTC
(OT) Re^9: Snarky comments on the ddj perl quiz (hijack, pvnv memory) by Argel (Prior) on Aug 30, 2007 at 23:08 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.