how to improve this script

firewall00 has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: how to improve this script by shmem (Chancellor) on Oct 10, 2007 at 10:25 UTC
any suggestion What is wrong about the suggestion I gave you on that very subject, along with an explanation of the code? It addresses your current problem of having more than five lines in a zone definition. --shmem _($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo. G°\ / /\_¯/(q / ---------------------------- \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."· ");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re: how to improve this script by apl (Monsignor) on Oct 10, 2007 at 13:31 UTC
I've been following all of your posted questions, and the threads they result in. You're doing yourself a disservice by coming here everytime you add a few lines and encounter another problem or have another question. You'll never strengthen your Perl-fu (or indeed, programming skills in general) if you don't try to solve these problems yourself.	[reply]
Re: how to improve this script by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 10, 2007 at 20:52 UTC
any suggestion Yeah, please don't put your post in `<h4>` tags! And what's with the double-spacing?	[reply] [d/l]
Re^2: how to improve this script by firewall00 (Acolyte) on Oct 12, 2007 at 11:15 UTC
Hello all i would apologize for my frequently asked similar question but i am really confused first i love perl so much .. i finished the learning perl book and i did all itis exercises and i felt my self familiar with perl BUT when it comming to writing my own code to perfome specific task i cannot and i feel my self fear of writting the code seems to be very confused huh :S what you are advice me ? what i can do to improve my perl how can i write my own code how to think the right thinking in the code and writting it :s really i want to learn and iwill do what you going to tell me and thanks ...	[reply]