in reply to Re: Possible to catch undefined sub at "compile" time?
in thread Possible to catch undefined sub at "compile" time?

Cheater!

--shmem

_($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo.  G°\        /
                              /\_¯/(q    /
----------------------------  \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."·
");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}
  • Comment on Re^2: Possible to catch undefined sub at "compile" time?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Possible to catch undefined sub at "compile" time?
by syphilis (Archbishop) on Oct 10, 2007 at 13:16 UTC
    And the print "After compilation, this message appears\n"; that never gets executed .... that must be post-runtime code :-)

    You're right, of course - the <flippancy> tags could just as well (or better) be replaced with <cheat> tags.

    Cheers,
    Rob