in reply to Re: Proposal: A "Cited/Linked by" list
in thread Proposal: A "Cited/Linked by" list

So, you're against this because somewhere someone has crappy data analysis for a puff piece on academic rating? What does that have to do with a reverse index, which is amazingly useful? It's a standard part of library research. No one said anything about ranking nodes or users or making statistical reports. It's just connecting nodes about the same topics to each other to make it better for the user. Don't give too much weight to an unrelated social consequence. Don't ever make anything useful lest someone might misuse it! Oh, the horror!
  • Comment on Re^2: Proposal: A "Cited/Linked by" list

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Proposal: A "Cited/Linked by" list
by CountZero (Bishop) on Oct 12, 2007 at 08:18 UTC
    Nothing wrong with a reverse index, but we have that already in the form of the Super Search function.

    CountZero

    A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James