Re^5: Writting Perl reserved words in Spanish or other foreign languages

Actually, learning programming is both learning programming and learning a programming language. It's really unavoidable. So why should one part of what you are learning be very useful while the other be only moderatly useful?

Regarding Pascal, what if I had learned C first and then picked up Pascal? The argument then would be that C was very valuable to me. Granted Pascal was likely easier to learn but maybe it simplified things too much? Maybe if I had learned in C to begin with I would have grasped concepts like pointers and stuff sooner (or better yet if we had started in assembler).

There are a lot of variables involved and it is not clear to me that Pascal was really the best choice for Computer Science majors.

Comment on Re^5: Writting Perl reserved words in Spanish or other foreign languages

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Writting Perl reserved words in Spanish or other foreign languages by djp (Hermit) on Oct 16, 2007 at 00:58 UTC
Well the research shows that if you'd learnt C first then Pascal you would be a poorer programmer than if you learnt them the other way around. That was my point. It's all about having a sound basis - C doesn't provide that because it's a mess.	[reply]