in reply to A hard RegEx problem.
"AND" is not really possible in regexes. You have to use advanced tricks such as positive lookaheads.
/^(?=.*[A-Za-z])(?=.*[0-9])[A-Za-z0-9]{3,10}\z/
Of course, you could possibly use multiple regexs for increased readability.
/^[A-Za-z0-9]{3,10}\z/ && /[A-Za-z]/ && /[0-9]/
Update: For fun,
Eliminates one lookahead:
/^(?=[A-Za-z0-9]{3,10}\z).*(?:[0-9][A-Za-z]|[A-Za-z][0-9])/
Eliminates both lookahead:
/(?>(?:[0-9][A-Za-z]|[A-Za-z][0-9]).*\z)(?(?{pos()<3||pos()>10})(?!))/
All tested.
Update: Benchmarked. (Benchmarking Code, a prime example of a good Benchmark if you ask me.)
---------------------------------------- Short (arg: 2j) Rate ikegami4 ikegami3 ikegami2 ikegami1 ikegami4 573/ms -- -60% -76% -77% ikegami3 1428/ms 149% -- -40% -44% ikegami2 2392/ms 318% 68% -- -5% ikegami1 2529/ms 342% 77% 6% -- ---------------------------------------- Fine (arg: n4a1z9) Rate ikegami4 ikegami2 ikegami1 ikegami3 ikegami4 638/ms -- -11% -18% -20% ikegami2 715/ms 12% -- -8% -10% ikegami1 776/ms 22% 9% -- -2% ikegami3 794/ms 24% 11% 2% -- ---------------------------------------- Just Letters (arg: nhfdmzaa) Rate ikegami4 ikegami3 ikegami2 ikegami1 ikegami4 397/ms -- -16% -44% -45% ikegami3 471/ms 19% -- -34% -35% ikegami2 714/ms 80% 52% -- -2% ikegami1 728/ms 83% 55% 2% -- ---------------------------------------- Long (arg: qq3m3aaaazz3) Rate ikegami4 ikegami1 ikegami3 ikegami2 ikegami4 157/ms -- -79% -88% -89% ikegami1 746/ms 376% -- -45% -45% ikegami3 1351/ms 762% 81% -- -1% ikegami2 1365/ms 770% 83% 1% --
My first choice based solely on benchmarks would be ikegami2 (the three regexps).
My first choice based solely on benchmarks would be ikegami1 (straightforward lookahead).
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: A hard RegEx problem.
by dsheroh (Monsignor) on Oct 19, 2007 at 04:53 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 19, 2007 at 05:02 UTC | |
| A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. |