in reply to Re: How to get sort-like semantics?
in thread How to get sort-like semantics?

What if we skipped checking the prototype and set up both @_, and $a and $b?

sub reduce(&@) { my $f = shift; my $a = shift; my $b; our @args; (local *_, local *args) = (sub { \@_ }->($a, $b), \@_); no strict 'refs'; my $caller = caller(); local *{$caller."::a"} = \$a; local *{$caller."::b"} = \$b; $b = shift(@args), $a = &$f while @args; return $a; }

Turns out it's negligeably faster for moderately long lists.

Rate ike1_p ike1_n ike2_p ike1_i ike2_i ike2_n ike1_p 6.34/ms -- -2% -2% -4% -6% -7% ike1_n 6.46/ms 2% -- -1% -3% -4% -5% ike2_p 6.50/ms 3% 1% -- -2% -3% -4% ike1_i 6.63/ms 5% 3% 2% -- -1% -2% ike2_i 6.72/ms 6% 4% 3% 1% -- -1% ike2_n 6.79/ms 7% 5% 4% 2% 1% -- (I)nline: reduce { $a * $b } 1..100; (P)rototype: reduce \&prototyped, 1..100; (N)o prototype: reduce \&unprototyped, 1..100;

Full Results

Benchmark code