Re^2: Spiffy: How to define the constructor to take parameters

Thank you, Grandfather!

This solution works nicely.

Is there a way to use your solution but employing the "spiffy" call to $self->super instead of my $self = bless {}, $class; ?

This would enable to fill in another superclass in the future without having to adapt the constructor.

Thank you
Bernhard

Comment on Re^2: Spiffy: How to define the constructor to take parameters Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Spiffy: How to define the constructor to take parameters by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Oct 29, 2007 at 01:36 UTC
Did you try just `my $self = super;` instead of reflexively posting a question? My criteria for good software: Does it work? Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Spiffy: How to define the constructor to take parameters by bwagner (Initiate) on Oct 29, 2007 at 07:10 UTC
Thank you, Dragonfly, I was not aware that `super` was a method that could be called as a free method. However, I could have seen it if more closely reading the docs. For the record, here's what I changed about the constructor: `sub new() { my $raw = pop @_; my $self = super; $self->raw($raw); return $self; }` [download] Thank you Bernhard	[reply] [d/l] [select]