in reply to Re^2: First JAPH
in thread First JAPH

++
Don't be too down on yourself. De-obfuscating it was satisfying to me. That's the big challenge of the JAPH - put JAPH in it without being able to read it. This is a good, honest solution to the problem.

I humbly seek wisdom.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: First JAPH
by LassiLantar (Monk) on Nov 06, 2007 at 00:18 UTC

    Thanks, goibhniu. I really appreciate it. I'm not the most self-confident person all the time. As myocom wrote once in RE: Adding 2 + 2, 

    print 4

    [download]

    Meets spec for the problem of Adding 2 + 2. I suppose this meets spec for a JAPH. I'm still working on breaking down your latest, and enjoying it thoroughly.

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Obfuscated Code