in reply to Re: perl language
in thread perl language

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: perl language
by moritz (Cardinal) on Nov 12, 2007 at 15:41 UTC
    The distinction between "compiled" and "interpreted" languages is mostly artificial these days.

    People tend to call them "compiler" if they store the byte code somewhere on disk, and you can easily (for whatever values of "easily") execute this byte code. Otherwise they're called "interpreter"

    But usually the process from source file to machine code involves both compilation (from abstract syntax trees to some kind of opcode tree) and interpretation (for example for optimization).

    For example most compilers would optimize a= 2 * 5 to a = 10, which is an interpretation at compile time.