(crazyinsomniac) Re: Fun with local :-(

You're violating a copywright, read this.
Apparently i am too ;-(

___crazyinsomniac_______________________________________
Disclaimer: Don't blame. It came from inside the void
perl -e "$q=$_;map({chr unpack qq;H*;,$_}split(q;;,q*H*));print;$q/$q;"

Comment on (crazyinsomniac) Re: Fun with local :-(

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: (crazyinsomniac) Re: Fun with local :-( by extremely (Priest) on Mar 17, 2001 at 06:43 UTC
Feh! Don't spread that garbage here. =P It is a trademark and is thus limited to protecting using the mark for the promotion of products; and even then only within their major product category. If you aren't selling anything, it is just a word. Don't call it a copyright, that is for complete works. And a service mark is for branding a company or service rather than a product. You can't call any consumable "Coke" but a few hundred years of steel workers are still allowed to call the molten mass of coal and iron "coke". And now, back to your regularly scheduled perl programming, already in progress... As if I didn't know it was a joke, dad =P -- $you = new YOU; honk() if $you->love(perl)	[reply]
Re: Re: (crazyinsomniac) Re: Fun with local :-( by myocom (Deacon) on Mar 17, 2001 at 06:59 UTC
Um, it's a joke, son...	[reply]