Re^2: Inheritance - parent of parent

WHY?

WHY NOT! What's wrong with calling an inherited method? The OP didn't say anything about calling an overridden method.

Comment on Re^2: Inheritance - parent of parent

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Inheritance - parent of parent by Joost (Canon) on Nov 23, 2007 at 02:55 UTC
To reiterate: WHY? There's no need to explicitly specify a superclass unless there's something that a subclass overrides and you really want to get something working right now instead of fixing the problem the right way. "What should it profit a man, if he should win a flame war, yet lose his cool?"	[reply]
Re^4: Inheritance - parent of parent by Crackers2 (Parson) on Nov 23, 2007 at 03:12 UTC
As far as I can tell he just wants to call a method that's defined in class A. There's nothing there saying he wants to explicitely specify that the method is coming from class A.	[reply]
Re^5: Inheritance - parent of parent by Joost (Canon) on Nov 23, 2007 at 03:17 UTC
Now that you said that, I see. But in that case, I don't see what the original question is. /me is bemused. "What should it profit a man, if he should win a flame war, yet lose his cool?"	[reply]