Well, I have been the poster to fwp... and I looked up your node after I posted (but I definitely knew
there must be something around like that in the monastery). Here is the exciting answer from Uri:
>>>>> "s" == shmem <gm@cruft.de> writes:
s> You forgot an obscure corner of hashes: hashes in scalar context.
s> Here's a a use - calculate the next power of 2 of a given number:
s> sub next_power_of_two {
s> my %s;
s> @s{1..shift} = ();
s> %s =~ '/';
s> return $';
s> }
s> ;-)
GACK!!!
and that assume knowledge of the internals of hashes. not a good thing
to teach! :)
uri
but your version is much more elegant, except perhaps the %s =~ '/' thingy ;-D
update: and I posted it only because the discussion went into discussing the pros and cons of dispatch
tables, oo, inheritance etc pp... in short, to introduce some fun again ;-)
--shmem
_($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo. G°\ /
/\_¯/(q /
---------------------------- \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."·
");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}
|