in reply to Re: RFC: Abusing "virtual" memory
in thread RFC: Abusing "virtual" memory
But the real issue is: "Why use a disk-based hash store when you need to process the keys in sorted order?" (Do you need to process them in sorted order?)
For that DB_File provides a disk-based hash store with sorted keys - DB_BTREE.
update: added link
--shmem
_($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo. G°\ /
/\_¯/(q /
---------------------------- \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."·
");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: RFC: Abusing "virtual" memory
by jbert (Priest) on Nov 27, 2007 at 17:47 UTC | |
by locked_user sundialsvc4 (Abbot) on Nov 28, 2007 at 04:46 UTC | |
by snowhare (Friar) on Dec 09, 2007 at 03:37 UTC |