in reply to Re: Negative zero? There's gotta be a sprintf that undoes that, right?
in thread Negative zero? There's gotta be a sprintf that undoes that, right?

Schweet! This solves my sprintf dilemma without additional subroutines (and then having to package + implement + distribute + maintain said subroutines).



Thanks!
  • Comment on Re^2: Negative zero? There's gotta be a sprintf that undoes that, right?