RE: RE: Re: Cookie Function Thingy

Hmmm.... no, CGI by itself handles cookies fine with its cookie() method. You don't need CGI::Cookie in addition, I don't think... correct me if I'm wrong, smoking something, or both.

Comment on RE: RE: Re: Cookie Function Thingy

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: Re: Cookie Function Thingy by chromatic (Archbishop) on Mar 31, 2000 at 05:34 UTC
I think I read somewhere that the CGI.pm folks are trying to split the functionality into a number of smaller modules, so you don't have to load and compile the whole beast if you only want to use part of it.	[reply]
RE: RE: RE: Re: Cookie Function Thingy by btrott (Parson) on Mar 31, 2000 at 05:38 UTC
No, you're quite right. I was just confused.	[reply]