in reply to Modern Perl and the Future of Perl
Okay, I have some thoughts about this.
I think this means a new edition of Learning Perl, and updates to the man pages that ship with perl. Possibly also, as some said above, a new Perl 5 version of the Camel Book.
There is a perception that Perl is a write-only language, and that perception needs to be broadly proven untrue. Somebody needs to advertise some extremely-well-crafted Perl. Not some really clever Perl hack, but some really-well-designed huge application.
I think a great TPF grant would be for somebody to spiff up the documentation of the most useful and popular Perl modules.
Those are just a few things that I thought up off the top of my head.
Perl is not dead. Now is the time to promote and get serious about keeping it alive, not after it's already died. It's true that Perl is huge, but so was Rome. That might seem like a silly analogy to some, but I think it's very accurate. Rome was so massive and so obviously invincible that nobody worked to prevent its fall until it was too late. Perl is so obviously huge that perhaps some don't imagine that it could ever die, but just because something is huge doesn't mean it can't shrink and shrink and shrink until it hardly exists anymore.
-Max
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Modern Perl and the Future of Perl
by ysth (Canon) on Dec 23, 2007 at 06:03 UTC | |
|
Re^2: Modern Perl and the Future of Perl
by Cop (Initiate) on Dec 21, 2007 at 04:44 UTC | |
by amarquis (Curate) on Dec 21, 2007 at 14:45 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 21, 2007 at 15:47 UTC | |
by Cop (Initiate) on Dec 21, 2007 at 16:04 UTC |