in reply to Re: poll ideas quest 2007
in thread poll ideas quest 2007

Should Perl become outlawed, what would you do (after the circumstancial denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance)?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: poll ideas quest 2007
by shmem (Chancellor) on Dec 31, 2007 at 14:38 UTC
    I personally.. well, I don't think it counts as "(any type of) Assembly", so I'd insert FORTH after that choice.

    --shmem

    _($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo.  G°\        /
                                  /\_¯/(q    /
    ----------------------------  \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."·
    ");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}
Re^3: poll ideas quest 2007
by blazar (Canon) on Dec 31, 2007 at 14:19 UTC

    I personally believe that I would:

    • Rebuild Perl from scratch and name it Perl

    But I also PB I would do so in a poorer way than $Larry did in the first place.

    Why is this in answer to my own -completely unrelated- suggestion, anyway?

    --
    If you can't understand the incipit, then please check the IPB Campaign.
      Why is this in answer to my own -completely unrelated- suggestion, anyway?

      Because I did not find a "reply" button or posting place that would just be another entry in the thread. It takes a while to become a proficient monk (^^,)

      EDIT : I had not noticed that "comment on..." at the top, before. It's got to be that one, I guess. the steps we've already taken are covered with wisdom but we still need to look back for seeing it...
Re^3: poll ideas quest 2007
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 31, 2007 at 16:00 UTC
    brainfsck. 
    brainfsck. 
    brainfsck. 
    brainfsck.