in reply to Re: single apostrophe's ruining external linking
in thread single apostrophe's ruining external linking

In the OP's title, "apostrophe's" doesn't mean plural, but "apostrophe is".
  • Comment on Re^2: single apostrophe's ruining external linking

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: single apostrophe's ruining external linking
by davis (Vicar) on Dec 31, 2007 at 20:44 UTC

    Verily, d'oh.
    That's the kind of boot in the backside lonely drunkards like me need. Nice one :)


    davis
    Kids, you tried your hardest, and you failed miserably. The lesson is: Never try.
Re^3: single apostrophe's ruining external linking
by zentara (Cardinal) on Jan 01, 2008 at 14:01 UTC
    shmem thanks for sticking up for me. :-) but now that I think about it, is that a legal contraction? Like davis, I've been drinking. :-)

    I'm not really a human, but I play one on earth. Cogito ergo sum a bum
      Like davis, I've been drinking. :-)

      Ah, that explains the missing double quotes in your link construct ;-)

      I guess it's legal, since it is the annotation of the words as spoken. "Apostrophe is" implies a sound break between the final "e" of "apostrophe" and "is", while "apostrophe's" denotes ligation of the two syllables. As written, it is ambiguous since it could also mean the apostrophe's dative form, but 'tis clear from context it ain't ;-)

      Disclaimer: I'm not a linguist and not a native english speaker, so that's all more a gut feeling than scientific fact. As always with me... see my sig ;-)

      Cheers!

      --shmem

      _($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo.  G°\        /
                                    /\_¯/(q    /
      ----------------------------  \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."·
      ");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}