in reply to Re^2: Anyone want to compress this a little more?
in thread Anyone want to compress this a little more?

Sincerest apologies to all, and thank you ed for the constructive response. I'm new to the monks site. I do care about it. I'm in the process of writing it, haven't compiled it yet and the thought came to me, there must be a way to compress this down such that I don't need to cut/paste/tweak the same 6 lines. I just tossed it out there as an afterthought as I continute to grind this out. I had hoped my breif explanation at the top of the message was sufficient to explain what I was trying to do. Again, sorry.
  • Comment on Re^3: Anyone want to compress this a little more?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Anyone want to compress this a little more?
by blazar (Canon) on Jan 11, 2008 at 18:30 UTC
    I'm in the process of writing it, haven't compiled it yet and the thought came to me, there must be a way to compress this down such that I don't need to cut/paste/tweak the same 6 lines.

    I personally believe that you should take those six lines and put them into a sub. Possibly put the sub into a module. I must admit that didn't follow the whole discussion because it looked like a mess, but this is a general purpose piece of advice that should apply to any situation in which you have the feeling you're copying and pasting too much.

    --
    If you can't understand the incipit, then please check the IPB Campaign.
Re^4: Anyone want to compress this a little more?
by olus (Curate) on Jan 11, 2008 at 19:04 UTC
    naveed010,

    Welcome to the Monastery and take some time to browse its sections. Particularly Tutorials.
    Read How (Not) To Ask A Question. That will help you getting help from others.

    As for the question itself, in my first reply I'm being honest (although it may not seem so) when I tell you to worry about making the code readable.
    In that same response I showed a revised version of the code, it happens to have more lines but still I think it is more readable. Take a look at it.
    And, surprise, it also answers the question you are now asking. The repeating parts are in a separate sub.

    The second reply is, of course, a joke.