in reply to Re^4: "When closures capture their context" and "scope gotchas in Javascript"
in thread "When closures capture their context" and "scope gotchas in Javascript"

s/support for Unicode/support for character semantics/g. You cannot have Unicode support without support for character semantics. I only mentioned Unicode because that's been babbled about for Ruby2 for ages.
My criteria for good software:
  1. Does it work?
  2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?
  • Comment on Re^5: "When closures capture their context" and "scope gotchas in Javascript"

In Section Meditations