in reply to Re^5: Is this DBM::Deep behavior, or something with tie/bless? (normal)
in thread Is this DBM::Deep behavior, or something with tie/bless?

You're correct; we have spoken in regards to this.

I did reply to you that I would be willing to write up a plugin, if I felt confident I could do it. But, as my post above stated: "I could potentially write a plugin for Data::Compare to handle this, but from what I can see that is way beyond my current ability." Trust me, I am more than willing to help out in this regard if I can. As for writing up a test for DBM::Deep, I'm still trying to puzzle out exactly how tests work.

All beauty and enthusiasm with no substance at this point, I'm afraid. :)
  • Comment on Re^6: Is this DBM::Deep behavior, or something with tie/bless? (normal)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Is this DBM::Deep behavior, or something with tie/bless? (normal)
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Feb 12, 2008 at 15:32 UTC
    The following is a failing test that demonstrates the problem. I would go ahead and extend it further to additional examples. Then, you now have something to write your plugin against.
    use Test::More tests => 1; use DBM::Deep; use Data::Compare; use File::Temp qw( tempfile ); my $filename = tempfile(); my $db = DBM::Deep->new( file => $filename ); $db->{foo} = [ 1 .. 3 ]; my $compare = { foo => [ 1 .. 3 ], }; ok( Compare( $db, $compare ), "The structures are the same" );
    Now, you also have an excellent example plugin with [src://Data::Compare::Plugins::Scalar::Properties]. You could copy that module, rename it, and change sp_scalar_compare to dbm_scalar_compare and change its logic a bit. At that point, you can run your test and see if anything passes. At that point, you can hand it to me and we can work with something. Remember - the hardest part is the blank page. Editing is sooo much easier than creating.

    My criteria for good software:
    1. Does it work?
    2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?