in reply to Re^5: Testing methodology, best practices and a pig in a hut.
in thread Testing methodology, best practices and a pig in a hut.

I suspect that other people object to what you write not because you're wrong but because you can be so unpleasant about it.

Hm. I see the debate is ended. Contrast this question:

Or perhaps you feel that no debate on this subject is called for?

With this statement:

I don't see the value in being contrarian solely for the sake of making the world less clear.

And now think about pots and kettles.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"Too many [] have been sedated by an oppressive environment of political correctness and risk aversion."
  • Comment on Re^6: Testing methodology, best practices and a pig in a hut.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Testing methodology, best practices and a pig in a hut.
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 01, 2015 at 20:12 UTC
    'I see the debate is ended.'

    And you lost.
[reply]
Re^7: Testing methodology, best practices and a pig in a hut.
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 01, 2015 at 20:17 UTC
    'I'd love to see the code you have which solves the same problems. '

    Yes, did you ever do that BrowserUk? It is fun to watch you get put in your place, but it would be nice to know that you can put your money where your big mouth is.

[reply]

In Section Meditations