in reply to Re^3: Unique Combos with Math::Combinatorics
in thread Unique Combos with Math::Combinatorics

ambrus:

Oh, I didn't expect an explanation. But the field is so foreign to me, that it was kind of like: "Oh, you have this hard problem? Just use Kenlar Blurfle, and you'll see that the obvious answer is 42". A line or two of context would've been helpful. ;^D Of course, then I wouldn't have had the fun of exploring mathworld a bit.

Two books come into my mind that explain finite geometry - both are suitable for beginners as they don't have much prerequisites:
Great <sigh> now I'll have to add "Learn Hungarian" to my long list of ToDos, so I can read them! ;^)

...roboticus

  • Comment on Re^4: Unique Combos with Math::Combinatorics