Well, here's yet another version (but without 'for', 'reverse', or 'map'):

printf <<HERE x 2, qw(emacs vi)[0,1,1,0];
Why do we have to hide from the police, daddy?
  Because they use %s and we use %s, son.
HERE
[download]

Update: Hmm, I only tested the above with 5.6.0 -- you can't directly subscript the qw() operator in 5.00503 it seems. Easily fixed by either wrapping the qw() inside another level of parens, or using the more literal:  ('emacs', 'vi')[0,1,1,0].