:-)

#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
# use Quick::Fingers;
use constant _onhosecond => y; # replace "y" with your chosen value be
+fore executing
use constant _you_are_really_quick => z;     # likewise

my ($time_to_move_cursor_to_browser_stop_button, $latency, $server_rea
+ction_time);

if ( (_onhnosecond + $time_to_move_cursor_to_browser_stop_button) < (_
+ohnosecond + $latency + $server_reaction_time)  && _you_are_really_qu
+ick ) { # 1.
    print "whew! Not exactly 'recalled' but good enough.\n";
} else {
    print "sorry!\n";
}

# Time waits for no man, except, maybe, the very quick.
[download]

^{1. Syntax error in Line 9 or bio-physically unlikely.}

More seriously, your second para addresses an issue which arises when a consideration addresses only one problem in a post with multiple failings -- say, a case in which formatting is borked AND the node was approved to an inappropriate category. TTBOMK, the only current answers are (1)to beg a Janitor to unconsider and then reconsider or (2) wait for the first to run its course and reconsider for the second flaw.

And "self-reap?" -- No, for various reasons, including the potential mischief that could allow. Reaping powers are reserved to a higher Order.