in reply to Many first obfuscations.. Here's my try.

Modification of a read-only value attempted at simple.pl line 2.

Of course, you could fix that with local:
31244)){ local $_
However I suspect most people around here fear your message. JASK implies ignorance of the underlying code, which is the opposite of what this site is about.

  • Comment on Re: Many first obfuscations.. Here's my try.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Many first obfuscations.. Here's my try.
by one4k4 (Hermit) on Mar 28, 2001 at 05:38 UTC
    I know the JASK rule. I just didnt feel like making AJAPH. :) Plus, I thought the xor against 31337 would imply the script kiddie part. That wasnt my mentality.

    Thanks for the local remark. I'm playing with some other things, and its actually helping me gain knowledge of those funny variables inside Perl. Which is the general plan anyway.

    _14k4 - webmaster@860.org (www.poorheart.com)
[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Obfuscated Code