Re^4: CGI and System Administration

Thanks for noting it (and good for you for taking the high road on it -- it's a pet peeve that so many "use strict or die" Perl hackers have a "So what, as long as it works in IE," attitude about XHTML/CSS). I don't know if it was the earlier version of Dojo (I think it was 0.4) or what but the code I inherited was rife with it and there were no alternatives offered in any forum post, code sample, or the very, very few documents I could find.

Comment on Re^4: CGI and System Administration

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: CGI and System Administration by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Apr 05, 2008 at 01:37 UTC
Oh, you can so write your stuff with the non-standard attributes and, in fact, that's the recommended way to do it. That said, I find it a lot nicer to use code that I can actually control. I don't trust anyone to parse my XHTML other than the browsers and then, I only trust so far. I certainly don't trust someone walking the DOM. I don't even trust my own DOM-walking code. Hence, why everything gets created by hand. My criteria for good software: Does it work? Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: CGI and System Administration
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Apr 05, 2008 at 01:37 UTC

My criteria for good software:

Does it work?
Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?

[reply]