Re: Count for unconsidered nodes?

Presumably you mean a "count of those considered nodes that you have not voted on"?

I may be wrong (and most probably am), but I'm not sure if this is do-able. Not accurately, anyway. Bear in mind that "nada" is always an option for voting, and if you choose this option for any considered nodes, those nodes will continue to appear as if you hadn't voted on them.

Nice idea++ though, and possibly worth considering nonetheless.

Cheers,
Darren :)

Comment on Re: Count for unconsidered nodes?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Count for unconsidered nodes? by ww (Archbishop) on Apr 14, 2008 at 17:44 UTC
Perhaps revising "not voted on" to "has not voted nay or yea" would provide another perspective. TBMOK, the voting options still appear after a "nada" vote, which makes nodes upon which a user has voted distinguishable from those where the user checked "nada." In fact, my perhaps mistaken understanding of the "nada" option is that it exists chiefly to allow correction of an unintended up or down vote on the consideration (because the action for "nada" is a nulop, IIRC). If I'm correct (and that sometimes happens), then the request should be "possible." However, it would take quite a bit of dev work, but might drop the server load a bit.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Count for unconsidered nodes?
by ww (Archbishop) on Apr 14, 2008 at 17:44 UTC

TBMOK, the voting options still appear after a "nada" vote, which makes nodes upon which a user has voted distinguishable from those where the user checked "nada." In fact, my perhaps mistaken understanding of the "nada" option is that it exists chiefly to allow correction of an unintended up or down vote on the consideration (because the action for "nada" is a nulop, IIRC).

If I'm correct (and that sometimes happens), then the request should be "possible." However, it would take quite a bit of dev work, but might drop the server load a bit.

[reply]