in reply to Downside of Perl (relative) popularity
I'm not certain there's a downside to Perl's popularity so much as there's a downside to short-sightedness and poor (or lack of) planning.
A few instructive clichés come to mind:
When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
It's possible to write bad code in any language. (or perhaps more appropriately: You can write good code in any language.)
Poor planning on your part doesn't require poor planning on mine.
The main points being:
Specialization and success are both nice, however, there is no excuse for complacency. I believe wise programmers (and managers, for that matter) will actively seek ways of doing things better, even when handed a disorganized or poorly designed mess to start with.
--f
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Downside of Perl (relative) popularity
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 30, 2001 at 00:59 UTC |