in reply to Re: Windows Service Pack Information
in thread Windows Service Pack Information
If you have rsh enabled on it then I'd think most security types would say that by definition don't have a secure network . . . :)
(Seriously there's better alternatives (such as ssh as was recommended elsewhere in the thread) that aren't gaping vulnerabilities begging to be exploited (they're smaller potential vulnerabilities which under active attack and countermeasure development :).)
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Windows Service Pack Information
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 17, 2008 at 21:11 UTC | |
by Fletch (Bishop) on Apr 17, 2008 at 21:34 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 17, 2008 at 21:48 UTC | |
by Fletch (Bishop) on Apr 17, 2008 at 22:18 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 17, 2008 at 23:27 UTC | |
|