Someone who thinks that basic English skills such as separation of topics into paragraphs and basic HTML skills are entirely irrelevant to being a good programmer simply because the implementation language is Perl has serious issues to overcome.

I don't accept any part of the personal attack made against me. The participants in a dialog are not "the listener". The attempt was made to tie me to heroin addiction and theft of the WebAPP code despite the fact that those claims are entirely and egregiously false. I can only guess that it was not hoped I would be convinced that I was a heroin addict and a thief, so therefore the only goal would have been to convince others. An ad hominem attack that is irrelevant (and how much more irrelevent can one get than untrue?) is one of the types that is fallacious. An attempt at degrading another's reputation or standing in public with claims the claimant knows to be false is not only logically fallacious, but entirely illegal as well. If it is not the purpose of the poster of such remarks to defame me, then that was not clear.

It is clear that one version of any buggy software being replaced almost wholesale by another version written by the same people will contain some bugs. A megabyte at an average of 50 characters per line is almost 21,000 lines of code. Do you really write over 20,000 lines of code without a single security issue? Without strictures, taint mode, and other safeguards in place, can you really claim that 1.3 MB of fresh Perl code that hasn't been specifically audited and tested will be safer than every other CMS? I like the confidence in your project, but I think you may need to check your enthusiasm against reality for a moment.