in reply to Re^12: What's the best Perl CMS?
in thread What's the best Perl CMS?
It is a bad argument because I am not that person, I don't know that person, I have not stolen code from you like you allege that person has, and since "mischief" is very common as a nickname or as part of a nickname you have no reason to assume I am the same person nor to attribute that person's alleged actions to me even conditionally.
If someone is going to judge what's relevant on PerlMonks, perhaps you should let it be monks with more experience and influence here than yourself. I've been a user here since 2001 and I think I have a handle on whether or not it is acceptable to mention solutions written in other languages from time to time. Very few people at PerlMonks are of the belief that Perl is the best tool for every job every time, although it is a great tool for most jobs most of the time.
To say that SSL is not helpful to security is just ludicrous. It won't make something secure by itself, but to forgo its use because other steps are also necessary is just silly. Taint mode isn't a necessary prerequisite to good security, but if you're cleaning user inputs sufficiently then turning it on won't produce any warnings anyway. It's a good safety net to help you make sure you're following good practice.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
| A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. |