Re^3: 5.10 shows uninitialized $@ warning

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: 5.10 shows uninitialized $@ warning by ikegami (Patriarch) on May 16, 2008 at 15:07 UTC
Your code never gets to execute the `eval`, much less to using `$@` afterwards, so you couldn't possibly get the a warning from using $@. That's like saying "I can't replicate the fact that you got 'foo' on the screen, but ignore the fact that I didn't actually call a print function."	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: 5.10 shows uninitialized $@ warning by syphilis (Archbishop) on May 16, 2008 at 15:28 UTC
Your code never gets to execute the eval Bullshit - under 5.10 at least - and whether or not it gets executed under perl 5.8 is irrelevant in terms of the original post. (It's the 5.10 behaviour that the op is interested in.) Let's just agree to have our respective lawyers sort this out tomorrow. Cheers, Rob	[reply]
Re^6: 5.10 shows uninitialized $@ warning by ikegami (Patriarch) on May 16, 2008 at 18:53 UTC
whether or not it gets executed under perl 5.8 is irrelevant in terms of the original post True. Forgot about that. A better example wouldn't be so confusing.	[reply]
Re^6: 5.10 shows uninitialized $@ warning by Anonymous Monk on May 17, 2008 at 10:20 UTC
There be only camels about	[reply]