Re: Perl, Web Apps, HTML::Template, HTML::Mason and the future

It sounds like you're looking for this article. I would replace Class::DBI with Rose::DB::Object now, and I'd probably use CGI::Application instead of the basic CGI she shows. Then you can run your code under CGI or mod_perl or FastCGI.

Comment on Re: Perl, Web Apps, HTML::Template, HTML::Mason and the future

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Perl, Web Apps, HTML::Template, HTML::Mason and the future by rudder (Scribe) on Jun 13, 2008 at 03:16 UTC
Just curious: why `Rose::DB::Object` over `DBIx::Class`?	[reply]
Re^3: Perl, Web Apps, HTML::Template, HTML::Mason and the future by perrin (Chancellor) on Jun 13, 2008 at 20:52 UTC
No offense to DBIx::Class, I just think RDBO is great. It has excellent docs, a great feature set, and the design seems very natural to me. The support on the mailing list is friendly and helpful, and a lot of people whose technical opinions I respect (merlyn, Ask Hansen, Bill Moseley) are on there and contributing.	[reply]