Re: Re (tilly) 5: Perl and Java

For the sake of clarity (or the lack of attention to what I wrote, whatever you want to call it), I'll state myself yet again (quoting from my earlier reply):

...My point was not to dismiss the technical merits of the article...

My entire point was that...well wait, I won't repeat what I've already said.

Comment on Re: Re (tilly) 5: Perl and Java

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re (tilly) 7: Perl and Java by tilly (Archbishop) on Apr 03, 2001 at 16:23 UTC
You had a point? And here I thought that you just were flaming someone for providing an interesting link that he had read when you clearly have not read it. You are clearly of the opinion that we should not base our opinions entirely on what someone else thinks. That is a laudable point of view. What is unjustified from that point of view is deciding, sight unseen, that other people's experiences are just worthless data that should be ignored...	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re (tilly) 7: Perl and Java
by tilly (Archbishop) on Apr 03, 2001 at 16:23 UTC

And here I thought that you just were flaming someone for providing an interesting link that he had read when you clearly have not read it.

You are clearly of the opinion that we should not base our opinions entirely on what someone else thinks. That is a laudable point of view. What is unjustified from that point of view is deciding, sight unseen, that other people's experiences are just worthless data that should be ignored...

[reply]